Jeff is a part-time volunteer manager at a small community hospital. He is responsible for staff education, special projects and the 50 auxiliary volunteers. An educator by trade, he is new to volunteer management, but embraces the idea that volunteers add real value to his organization. He has an auxiliary president and vice president who recruit, interview and train the new volunteers. The hospital volunteers run the gift shop, do office work and are expected to staff the reception desk seven days a week. Lately, though, the receptionist volunteers have been telling the auxiliary president that they cannot effectively do their job because the desktop computer doesn’t work properly.
A rather ancient piece of equipment, the computer is necessary for finding a patient’s location. The computer acts up by losing connections and then it takes a few minutes to reboot. The volunteers resort to calling hospital staff for room numbers, which is beginning to be a problem for irritated employees who are impatient with the volunteers. Jeff, thinking that it would be an easy fix, put in a work request to repair or replace the desktop. When he did not receive a timely reply and after more volunteers complained, he called the maintenance department who told him the request was being reviewed. Puzzled, Jeff called his superior who said that all capital expenses or major repairs had to be reviewed by a committee. When pressed on how long the process would take, the superior curtly said that he did not know, but would inform Jeff when he had an answer. After three weeks of growing impatience and endless excuses, the volunteers started to doubt that Jeff had actually requested help. They began to complain loudly and some threatened to quit. Jeff called his supervisor again and brusquely asked about the status of his request. “Come on,” he said, “I’ve got people wanting to quit. I need some movement on this.” After another week, the fed up volunteers started to miss their shifts, leaving Jeff to frantically call the auxiliary president to find replacements. The empty reception desk was noticed, but instead of acknowledging Jeff’s predicament, the senior management complained down through the channels that Jeff was not doing his job staffing the front desk. Jeff blew his stack. “This is ridiculous,” Jeff fumed. “If they expect a volunteer to do a job for free, the least they can do is provide them the tools necessary to do that job. Instead, this organization drags its financial heels, thinking that it doesn’t matter. Well it does. Paid staff can’t and won’t just quit, but volunteers can and will.” Jeff continued, “and then, they have the nerve to complain when volunteers quit, as if they have no culpability in this. It’s maddening how they dismiss the basic tools volunteers need, but are vocal when their roadblocks cause us to lose volunteers. It’s as if they think that volunteers will do anything asked of them, no matter how they are treated or no matter how tough they make it for the volunteers to successfully do their job. It’s ludicrous!”
Jeff is spending a great deal of time soothing the disillusioned volunteers who rightfully feel that they are not worth the price of a new computer. Jeff is not giving up, even though some really good long-term volunteers are choosing to stay home. He’s not used to using the nails on a blackboard voice, but to him, it has become about what is right. Hopefully his administration will do the right thing. Hopefully they will realize the difference between staff who must deal with inconveniences and volunteers, who can choose to leave if conditions are unacceptable.
But if administration won’t, then when the next volunteer leaves, each manager should be made to figure out how to replace that volunteer and each manager should have to say to the new volunteer, “You know we really don’t think you are worth proper equipment. But keep coming in and working for free anyway and stop complaining.”
Because essentially, that’s what Jeff has to do.
-Meridian
I would have advised Jeff to do two things. First find a volunteer with computer experience to work on the problem. Second, get his supervisor to grant him the authority to move ahead with improvements or repairs up to a certain dollar limit without committee review. Of course, as a volunteer who has worked for a “Jeff” I would have “gone over his head” to get the needed work done.
LikeLike
Hi! Thanks for your insight and comments and for your volunteer work. I, too, have volunteers who want to go over my head to get things done and sadly, that is the quickest way to be dismissed as a volunteer. I caution them that volunteering comes with rules and regulations, especially in a health care setting. Both staff and volunteers must abide by the rules. I suspect that Jeff’s hospital has an IT department which means that they, and only they are the ones to “fix” computers.
This story is an example of how difficult it can be for volunteer managers to play middle man. While we would LOVE for the volunteers to just do what needs to be done, (and we all have many volunteers with the skills) we have to operate within the framework of our organizations. It’s frustrating to say the least. I’d love to have you and your can-do attitude!
LikeLike
I can’t ‘like’ this post, because it is too sad, too bad. For the want of a computer up-grade a whole volunteer service is at risk of going down the tubes. Reminds me of the old nursery rhyme / proverb “For the want of a nail….. a kingdom was lost”.
LikeLike
Hi Sue! It is sad that volunteer programs lose volunteers due to small things that can be easily remedied. It puts the volunteer manager, who gets frustrated with all the lack of perceived caring into a horrible position. Explaining to upper management that “they” were at fault never works if “they” do not understand the nuances of working with volunteers. Sigh.
LikeLike
What an infuriating situation! I have run into similar attitudes in my place of work–a total disconnect between cause and effect. In this case, I think the best thing for Jeff to do is just allow those volunteers to quit, close that role down entirely,and not bring anyone new on until the computers have been fixed. Until the organization really experiences the consequences of their negligence, they won’t “get it.” Jeff cannot keep driving himself crazy like this; it’s going to be a bad end for both him and the volunteers. When administration wants to know why there is no desk staffing anymore, he should just repeat over and over again, “I cannot staff the desk until adequate tools are in place for those volunteers do their job.”
LikeLike
Bingo Kristen, I think you have nailed it perfectly! In my organization, I am telling every volunteer coordinator to use repetition without emotion as a way to get through to higher ups when frustrated by a lack of support. A droning “I can’t get the volunteers needed until (fill in the blank) is rectified,” goes further and creates less banging of the head. Thank you for that insight!
LikeLike
This could be written by me. After many years of trying to fix problems to make for a better volunteer experience, I’ve changed my approach. I frame everything for the patient/visitor experience. If a visitor comes in to our hospital and can’t find their loved one easily and quickly that is a bad experience. Administration knows that language.
LikeLike
Thanks Kari, you not only make an excellent point, you’ve given the rest of us a well thought out approach. Framing requests to show how it impacts the visitors’ experience gets more attention than framing the request from the volunteer perspective. It just goes to show you how resourceful we have to be to accomplish all we need to do for our volunteers. Heck, if it works, maybe the perspective needs to be about money saved, or marketing share. Thanks for the great tip!
LikeLike